Last year, as a graduate student, I joined the Graduate Council. This is a division of the Academic Senate, and is responsible for stamping and approving (or disapproving) issues that may affect graduate life. Student funding and housing are higher-profile work, but don't quite get the depth of time and energy that program reviews, catalog changes, and similar. The vast majority of the Council's decisions end in writing a letter, reccomending that a program provide more information, or approving a particular plan. This isn't budgetary approval (although budgetary issues may be raised); it is instead weighing proposals on their academic, and educational, impact.
In general, of course, graduate students don't know a lot about their schools. I think we all pick up, pretty quickly, the structure of the department--deans and professors and suchlike. There's a hierarchy of getting stuff done and checks written, and we all figure out how it goes.
It goes from God, to Jerry, to you, to me, to the cleaners.
-"Real Genius":http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089886/quotesIn particular, we learn that administrative assistants know everything; and that anything can be fixed or finessed if an administrative assistant and a professor both agree on it. But I don't think we think much more about the rest of the university, outside our own department or school. Most are generally unaware of roles like the vice-chair for graduate affairs in their own department, much less the higher levels. So while the Graduate Council grinds through the (very imporant) "Graduate Student Rights and Responsibilities" document, I'll throw out a few notes. These apply to UCI; I'm sure there are parallel versions at your institution.
[more inside]
(Indeed, the chain--at least for systemic or rules-based problems--is "your advisor, your chair, your dean, the dean of graduate studies or the grad council, vice chancellor for student affairs". Each will be disappointed if you haven't tried to address it more locally.)
There's an ambiguity, there, in which issues are Grad Council and which ones are Dean. I don't really know how to address that--the Council studies curriciula and roles, while Deans deal with people, might be one version of the division of labor. But the distinctions are loosely-drawn, and of the various mysterious mechanisms, the Council flies the most under the radar.
For the record, lots of these organizations are surprisingly answerable to students. For example, Council minutes are a matter of public record. The question is how the public record should be made available. Do students know that they can simply speak to the Council Analyst and get them?
June 4, 2004 10:33 PM | TrackBack | in Other